Vaping Flavors – The Truth About the California State Flavor Ban
The brand new wave of electronic cigarettes called Vaporizers are a huge leap forward vapinger.com from the standard cigarette. The first Vaporizers were tank-top models that held several ounces of liquid that you poured into your mouth and took a draw. That has been the norm for about ten years and a half, but things have changed in the past 12 months. We’re now seeing vapors coming through the hose, being inhaled directly and then exhaled slowly through the exhale.
It is critical to know very well what the attorneys general come to mind about. They are primarily concerned with three issues: underage smokers, carbon monoxide smoke and toxins in electronic cigarettes. There were many articles written with this issue and I won’t go into them in great detail here. But suffice it to state that attorneys general have become alarmed at the trend of underage smoking and the poison levels that exist in vaporized e-juices.
The primary reason that the attorneys general are alarmed is that vaporizing cigarettes is not actually any safer than smoking. Sure, some people might be able to quit cold turkey. And perhaps they’ll develop a awesome down-regulated nicotine replacement system that can function like the real thing. But a large number of people use these products each day but still aren’t doing better at quitting. Quite simply, vaporizing cigarettes are only a fancy solution to hide a negative habit.
But there’s another thing that the attorneys general are alarmed at; the ingredients that are located in e-juices. You see, in recent years we’ve seen a spike in e-juice manufacturing companies that use things like vegetable glycerin in their juices. Now vegetable glycerin, while healthy, is also extremely bad for your lungs, which you will probably know all too well as a former smoker.
So, what does all of this mean for you personally as a consumer? Basically it means that vaporizing flavors haven’t any place in e liquids, and vice versa. As a matter of fact, it’s perfectly legal to not use these dangerous ingredients in the liquids. You’re free to choose from an array of delicious herbal flavors, including peppermint and lemon poppy seed. Many of liquid companies even include a few healthy options for one to choose from such as acai berry or green tea extract.
But what about all those wonderful tasting vaporizing flavors? Well, the issue again is they are simply not likely to be very profitable for companies because a lot of people will simply not purchase them. Most people don’t think to look beyond the essential vanilla custard flavoring when choosing an e liquid. And even after trying lots of the healthy flavored or liquids on the market, almost all people will choose to stick to the more traditional vanilla flavored vapors. Why?
It appears that the problem with the flavor ban is that it hasn’t caused a significant shift in the way people enjoy their e liquids. Sure, some companies have moved away from some of the more threatening flavorings, but they’ve also remained very popular. It appears that companies aren’t really motivated to create changes to their products that may change lives in your health. The new California law did force the firms that produce unflavored vaporizers to add some kind of warning concerning the chemicals in the product, but they haven’t really done much to produce a safer product yet.
So in the end, the California “Flavor Ban” didn’t accomplish much at all. Apart from maybe making some adult beverages taste better, it did not change the way people use or purchase vaporizers. It really is true that the ” Flavor Ban “did” cause certain companies to avoid producing some of their more dangerous flavors, but this law didn’t consider the overwhelming number of flavors that are available on the market today. It’s still important for one to choose only the healthiest and highest quality vaporizers that you can afford. In the end, you will be happy that you did.